|
Boost Users : |
From: boxerab (boxerab_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-12 10:25:30
Bill,
Thanks for the explanation of your plans for thread priorities.
At the moment, as a work-around on win32, is it possible to
access the underlying windows thread handle, and set the
priority manually?
Thanks.
Aaron Boxer
boxerab_at_[hidden]
--- In Boost-Users_at_y..., "William E. Kempf" <wekempf_at_c...> wrote:
>
> Mark Storer said:
> > I'd think a relatively simple implementation would be to simply support
> > them when possible, and otherwise turn all such calls into no-ops.
>
> That would be a major pain for users. If they aren't available, they
> shouldn't exist, and the hooks for conditional compilation should be
> provided (this is what POSIX does).
>
> > Coming up with a range of priority values that would be portable
> > shouldn't be too terribly difficult either.
>
> Actually, this *IS* the difficult part (well, beyond the design decisions).
>
> --
> William E. Kempf
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net