RE: [Boost-Users] Re: Why is <boost::function>::_1 not in namespa ce boost?

From: Tom Matelich (tmatelich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-28 22:54:15

> 
> I think I agree with Markus that it is in fact broken.  It's easy to
> imagine dependency scenarios like this:
> 
>     lambda <-- libA <-\
>                        }--> App
>     bind   <-- libB <-/
> 
> The guy writing App shouldn't have to be aware of the dependency
> conflict between libA and libB.  

Isn't this only a problem within translation units?  I suppose lambda and
bind might be included in headers from libA and libB into a single
translation unit in App, but seems unlikely.  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:  Information contained in this message and/or
attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc.
If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
the sender by return email.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------