RE: [Boost-Users] Re: HP, aCC and the standards

From: Tom Matelich (tmatelich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-11 12:45:13

actually I talked with one of the people on the aCC dev team and they are
looking into adding boost into their test procedues.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dlux42 <dlux_at_[hidden]> [mailto:dlux_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 2:15 PM
> To: Boost-Users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [Boost-Users] Re: HP, aCC and the standards
> 
> 
> > > While many compiler vendors strive to be able to compile boost,
> > > is this really a measure of Standard C++ conformance?
> > 
> > A pretty good one.  That's why they use it as a test.
> 
> It may be true, but HP won't accept it. We help them a lot if we can
> point to a part of the standard and can show an "aCC -E" output and an
> "aCC -c" output and say: "this point is badly implemented, because it
> is not compiled, although the standard said it should".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
> ---------------------~-->
> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/LIgTpC/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/EbFolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
> 
> Info: <http://www.boost.org>
> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:  Information contained in this message and/or
attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc.
If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
the sender by return email.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------