|
Boost Users : |
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-28 13:59:28
At 06:55 AM 2/28/2003, Markus Werle wrote:
>I see several possibilities:
>
>1. The standard rules, AFAICS, are meant for the _user_ interface
>(I guess this from the bogus names some vendors use to make their
>internal code completly unreadable)
>
>So would it be acceptable if some boost::lib is rule-compliant
>in the interface and for the "public" namespaces, while retaining
>the other style in the brain-damaging internals, where some
>programmers might need them to understand their own code?
I'm not sure that exact question has been asked before. My immediate
reaction is that naming conventions are much more important for the public
interface than for implementation internals.
--Beman
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net