|
Boost Users : |
From: adutoit (adutoit_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-22 02:14:41
Great!
The /Zc:wchar_t project option did the trick. I will still check my STLPort
/ VC98 interaction as specified in one of your previous emails.
Thanks a lot for the helpfull advice.
Greetings,
Andre.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Matelich" <tmatelich_at_[hidden]>
To: <Boost-Users_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 7:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Boost-Users] boost::date_time::posix_time and Intel Compiler
7.0?
> I think you might be getting bit by the way wchar_t == unsigned short on
> MSVC, and when Intel uses MSVC compatibility. If you look, its using a
> basic_stringstream<wchar_t...>
>
> You could try /Zc:wchar_t to make wchar_t an intrinsic type.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: adutoit [mailto:adutoit_at_[hidden]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 7:41 AM
> > To: Boost-Users_at_[hidden]
> > Subject: Re: [Boost-Users] boost::date_time::posix_time and Intel
> > Compiler 7.0?
> >
> >
> > I know I said I will not return soon, but I finally realised
> > that stupid
> > Visual C++ is to blame for my original compilation error, not
> > anyone from
> > Boost or the Intel compiler writer team.
> >
> > For some reason, the order in which you specify include paths
> > (for crying
> > out loud!) matters in Visual C++!!!
> >
> > That means I must specify STLPort include path first, then stupid VC98
> > include path. Now I am down to one compilation error, using my
> > much-reported compilation setup :
> >
> > Compiling...
> > graph_qt.cpp
> > C:\PROGRAM FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/lexical_cast.hpp(147): error: no
> > operator "<<" matches these operands
> > operand types are: _STL::basic_stringstream<wchar_t,
> > _STL::char_traits<wchar_t>, _STL::allocator<wchar_t>> << const
> > _STL::basic_string<char, _STL::char_traits<char>,
> > _STL::allocator<char>>
> > return stream << input;
> > ^
> > detected during:
> > instantiation of "bool={bool}
> > boost::detail::lexical_stream<Target,
> > Source>::operator<<(const Source &)
> > [with Target=unsigned short, Source=_STL::basic_string<char,
> > _STL::char_traits<char>, _STL::allocator<char>>]" at line 192
> > instantiation of "Target
> > boost::lexical_cast<Target,Source>(Source) [with
> > Target=unsigned short,
> > Source=_STL::basic_string<char, _STL::char_traits<char>,
> > _STL::allocator<char>>]" at line 30 of "C:\PROGRAM
> > FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/date_ti
> > me/time_parsing.hpp"
> > instantiation of "time_duration
> > boost::date_time::parse_delimited_time_duration<time_duration>(const
> > _STL::string &) [with time_duration=boost::posix_time::time_duration]"
> > compilation aborted for
> > C:\home\adutoit\work\s3_qt\s3_qt\graph_qt.cpp (code
> > 2)
> > Error executing cl.exe.
> >
> > libs3_qt.lib - 1 error(s), 0 warning(s)
> >
> >
> > Any ideas? (Except for checking my include path specs again :) )
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Andre
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "adutoit" <adutoit_at_[hidden]>
> > To: <Boost-Users_at_[hidden]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 4:16 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Boost-Users] boost::date_time::posix_time and
> > Intel Compiler
> > 7.0?
> >
> >
> > > Right; here are my compiler options, build configuration
> > and the rest.
> > >
> > > Basically I am building a static library, which depends on
> > some in-house
> > > software components, Qt and Boost.
> > > Our own library S3FC (), uses templates in such a manner as
> > to make MSVC6
> > > very unhappy. Therefore we use the Intel compiler under M$.
> > > Needless to say, our software compiles problemfree with
> > GCC. For the
> > > aforementioned and other reasons we do not make use of
> > > Microsoft Foundation Classes when compiling under Windoze,
> > but use the
> > > latest version of STLPort (which has been at the same
> > version level for
> > some
> > > time now).
> > >
> > > Anyway; our Windows development work takes place under
> > Visual C++ but with
> > > the Intel compiler (version 7.0) selected instead of the
> > MSVC6 compiler.
> > >
> > > OK; with this background then, here is the basic Visual C++ project
> > settings
> > > for my build of the above-mentioned library. I have
> > removed include paths
> > > etc. which point to in-house
> > > software:
> > >
> > > 1) "Not Using MFCC" selected for general project settings
> > (as explained
> > > above).
> > > 2) Warning level => 3
> > > Optimizations => Maximise Speed
> > > Debug info => None
> > > 3) Project Options =>
> > > /nologo /ML /W3 /GR /GX /O2 /D "NDEBUG" /D "DEP_MS_WIN"
> > /D "WIN32" /D
> > > "_WINDOWS"
> > > /U "QT_NO_STL" /Fp"Release/libs3_qt.pch" /YX /Fo"Release/"
> > /Fd"Release/"
> > /FD
> > > /c
> > >
> > > The include and library paths for STLPort is set somewhere
> > else, but these
> > > are basically the options.
> > >
> > > If anyone knows of any special project options,
> > preprocessor directives I
> > am
> > > perhaps missing for building Boost-related projects with the Intel
> > compiler,
> > > please let me know!
> > > I suspect that we will soon be using Boost for other
> > functionality besides
> > > that provided by date_time at the moment. Besides, I like
> > the library and
> > > works in our main development environment,
> > > Linux with the GCC compiler.
> > >
> > > OK, I am forgetting about this problem for a day or two...
> > > Thanks to everyone who has provided me with help so far,
> > especially Jeff
> > > Garland.
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > > Andre.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]>
> > > To: <Boost-Users_at_[hidden]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:42 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [Boost-Users] boost::date_time::posix_time and
> > Intel Compiler
> > > 7.0?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Anyway; it just irks me that I should have issues with
> > 'standard'
> > stuff,
> > > > > like streaming operators.
> > > > > And the fact that the same code compiles with MSVC6 and
> > NOT the Intel
> > > > > compiler.
> > > >
> > > > Ok.
> > > >
> > > > > Back on the #define which started my woes. The fact of
> > the matter is,
> > I
> > > get
> > > > > everything compiled when using MSVC6 and not the Intel compiler!
> > > > > I.e. the MSVC6-specific code works, the 'other'
> > compiler code for the
> > > > > supposedly more Boost-compliant/friendly Intel compiler
> > does not.
> > > >
> > > > I guess I was thinking that what was happening is that
> > when compiling
> > > > with Intel you were getting the MSVC defined and hence
> > were taking the
> > > > non-generic code. Perhaps not...
> > > >
> > > > Have you tried to run the tests in libs/date_time/test with your
> > > > Intel/STLPort configuration? That might help diagnose the issue.
> > > > Also, it might be instructive to post your compile
> > command. Perhaps
> > > > someone with experience on Intel can figure out why your
> > configuration
> > > > differs from the one that apparently passes the tests.
> > > >
> > > > > Could it be because I am using STLPort in conjunction
> > with the Intel
> > > > > compiler?
> > > >
> > > > Might be a factor. There have been some issues before
> > with the library
> > > > configuration assuming MSVC limitations which don't apply
> > with STLPort
> > > > in the mix.
> > > >
> > > > > Aargh. Just give me Linux and GCC...
> > > >
> > > > Agreed :-)
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Info: <http://www.boost.org>
> > > > Wiki:
> > <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
> > > > Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Info: <http://www.boost.org>
> > > Wiki:
> > <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
> > > Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ---------------------~-->
> > Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's
> > Important Questions.
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/uetFAA/EbFolB/TM
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------~->
> >
> > Info: <http://www.boost.org>
> > Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
> > Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: Information contained in this message and/or
> attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc.
> If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
> the sender by return email.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Info: <http://www.boost.org>
> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net