|
Boost Users : |
From: cerenoc (julm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-09 23:17:02
Hello,
I just wanted to clarify if the following behavior is correct. As
far as I understood, in matrix and vector range function, the 1st
argument defines the starting point and the second defines the length
of the range. The following code I ran on gcc 2.96 shows that the
behavior is different when starting at 0 and starting somewhere
else. Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding something?
Thank you,
Julian
// define some vector r(3)
std::cout << r << "\n\n";
boost::numeric::ublas::vector<double> rr = r(range(0, 0));
std::cout << rr << "\n\n";
rr = r(range(0, 1));
std::cout << rr << "\n\n";
rr = r(range(0, 2));
std::cout << rr << "\n\n";
rr = r(range(0, 3));
std::cout << rr << "\n\n";
//rr = r(range(1, 0)); // THIS RESULTS IN ASSERTION ERROR
//std::cout << rr << "\n\n";
rr = r(range(1, 1));
std::cout << rr << "\n\n";
rr = r(range(1, 2));
std::cout << rr << "\n\n";
rr = r(range(1, 3));
std::cout << rr << "\n\n";
OUTPUT:
[3](0,1,2)
[0]()
[1](0)
[2](0,1)
[3](0,1,2)
[0]()
[1](1)
[2](1,2)
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net