Re: MPL::lambda issue: what am I doing wrong?

From: Brian Simpson (yg-boost-users_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-11 16:12:00

"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:00f701c347cf$e0252940$d2f2d90c_at_metacomm.com...
> Brian Simpson wrote:
> > It gets me to the next (apparent) obstacle, which is that I need to
define
> a
> > variant using the types in the derived sequence (the second_types, to be
> > specific).
>
> Are we talking about 'boost::variant' here? Because the latter accepts
> MPL-sequence template arguments directly - you just pass a sequence to it,
> and
> that's all.
>
[...]
Oops.  I got the impression, from the conversations resulting from the
review of boost::variant, that that feature was being removed.  I'll try it
and see what I get.
Meanwhile, just before I got your post, I submitted another one, which deals
with this same problem applied to boost::tuple.  I'll do a little research
over the weekend to see if I jumped the gun there, too ;) .

--Brian