Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-18 16:38:25

the ramifications of having any destructor throw are too horrible to
Well, maybe not "too horrible" but several articles have been written on
the ensuing problems.
At Monday 2003-08-18 14:43, you wrote:
>What's the rational for the requirement that ~pointee() be no throw? Instead
>of nothrow could it have been specified that shared_ptr functions throw only
>if ~pointee() throws?
>This is also something that could go in the docs (assuming I didn't simply
>miss it).
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>Info: <<>>
>Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
><>Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Victor A. Wagner Jr.
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at