Boost Users :
From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-26 07:58:46
On Monday 25 August 2003 10:21 pm, Darren Cook wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I can almost match that up to the parts in the while
> loop, except mention of "list" is missing. Should it be:
> boost::bind(&Points::add, &list,
> boost::bind(&InfoContainer::get, &cs, _1))));
Yes, that's correct.
> BTW, I was hoping I'd be able to do something like this:
> list.add(cs.get( _1 )->key)
This is why we want lambda support in the language :)
> But after some experiments with boost::lambda I see why this isn't
> possible. I think if just one call to bind is possible then it is worth it,
> but when bind is required 2 or more times, falling back to a while loop or
> a functor seems better. Is anyone else using a similar guideline?
I still find the bind/lambda versions less error-prone than writing the
equivalent (small) for/while loop, but I tend to put the lambda expression
that I really want to write in a comment.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net