Re: [Boost-users] int64_t error

From: Gilad Suberri (gsuberri_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-12 11:52:11

Thanks. It seems that I do not have the file "stdint.h", so in cstdint.hpp,
int64_t is defined in the last #else section (that goes with #ifdef
BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H).
When operators.hpp is included before this file (cstdint.hpp,) int64_t does
not get defined at all because this next statement from cstdint.hpp becomes
false:

# if defined(BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG) && \
   !defined(BOOST_MSVC) && !defined(__BORLANDC__) && \
   (!defined(__GLIBCPP__) || defined(_GLIBCPP_USE_LONG_LONG)) && \
   (defined(ULLONG_MAX) || defined(ULONG_LONG_MAX) ||
defined(ULONGLONG_MAX))

When the include statements are switched around int64_t gets defined. This
is connected to posix_time_config.h where
"boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp" is included before
"boost/date_time/time_resolution_traits.hpp", which causes the above
problem. I switched the two include statements and I am not running into
that compiler error anymore, but I am not sure if that will cause other
compiler errrors. Hope some of this made sense, let me know what you think
or if I am missing anything. Thanks.

Gilad

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost Users mailing list" <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] int64_t error

> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:42:08 -0500, Gilad Suberri wrote
> > Hi, I am compiling my projects on Solaris, using the latest version
> > of the boost date_time library. All the gregorian examples compile
> > and build fine, but when I try to compile posix_time ones I get this
> > error:
> >
> > ...error details snipped...
> > The version of gcc is 3.0.2.
> > I do not get this compiler error when I use gcc 2.95.3, but I needed
> > to use the newer version.
> >
> > Any ideas? Thanks.
>
> I suspect that somehow you are not getting boost::int64_t defined.
Although
> looking at the logic in boost/config I'm not seeing why at the moment -- 
you
> might experiment with trying to make sure boost::int64_t is defined.  I
won't
> have a chance to look until later as I'm running out the door.  Bottom
line is
> it should work with this compiler...
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users