Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Marco Donizelli (maleko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-05 12:44:15


Hi there,
when I built the 1_30_2 Python Library, I got:

libboost_python.so

now, with 1_31_0, I get several libs but that one:

libboost_python-gcc-1_31.a
libboost_python-gcc-1_31.so
libboost_python-gcc-1_31.so.1.31.0
libboost_python-gcc.a
libboost_python-gcc-d-1_31.a
libboost_python-gcc-d-1_31.so
libboost_python-gcc-d-1_31.so.1.31.0
libboost_python-gcc-d.a
libboost_python-gcc-d.so
libboost_python-gcc-mt-1_31.a
libboost_python-gcc-mt-1_31.so
libboost_python-gcc-mt-1_31.so.1.31.0
libboost_python-gcc-mt.a
libboost_python-gcc-mt-d-1_31.a
libboost_python-gcc-mt-d-1_31.so
libboost_python-gcc-mt-d-1_31.so.1.31.0
libboost_python-gcc-mt-d.a
libboost_python-gcc-mt-d.so
libboost_python-gcc-mt.so
libboost_python-gcc.so

Unless I made a mistake in the building step which prevented

libboost_python.so

to be created, the first solution that comes to my mind to solve
this backward compatibility problem would be to create a symlink from
libboost_python.so to one of the new libraries. The question is,
what would you recommend:

libboost_python-gcc.so

or

libboost_python-gcc-mt.so

(or none of the above, but....)

thanks a million
marco


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net