Re: [Boost-users] Re: Configquestion:BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T(Intel7.1)

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-30 05:13:35

> It seems to me that it would be better still to put
>
>     #ifdef BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T
>         BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(is_same<unsigned short, wchar_t>::value);
>     #else
>         BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(!is_same<unsigned short, wchar_t>::value);
>     #endif
>
> after the conditional definition of BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T to
> verify that the macro has been set/unset correctly.

Not a bad idea, but it brings in a lot of type-traits code that may not
actually be needed...

John.