RE: [Boost-users] protassign

From: Nat Goodspeed (ngoodspeed_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-24 13:07:36

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nat Goodspeed
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 12:17 PM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: RE: [Boost-users] protassign
> 
> In the forthcoming Boost serialization library:
> 
> http://www.rrsd.com/boost/
> 
> there's a state_saver template class that does what you're talking
> about:
> 
> http://www.rrsd.com/boost/libs/serialization/doc/state_saver.html
> 
> This seems useful enough to promote to a library more general than the
> serialization library.

  Hmm! I was suggesting that the state_saver template from the
serialization library be elevated.
  If the protassign template makes it into Boost sooner, may I suggest
that the serialization library be revised to use protassign instead of
state_saver? We certainly wouldn't want two redundant Boost templates.