Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-06 05:24:51

David Abrahams wrote:

> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> I am always in favor of
>>> designs which are clear and understandable over all other
>>> considerations.
>> And what's so un-understantable about boost::path which has both narrow
>> and wide methods?
> I'm finding it hard to argue with that idea.

You mean it's hard to argue with the idea to have

   class path {

or with the idea to have

   template<class charT>
   class basic_path {

or that designs should be clear and understandable? ;-)

- Volodya

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at