|
Boost Users : |
From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-20 15:58:45
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:30:04 +0100, Jonathan Oulds wrote
> Could anyone explain to me why there is not a default constructor
> for boost::gregorian::date_time and boost::posix_time::ptime.
Yes, you can see this thread:
http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost-users/msg05864.php
> I implemented a simple constructor where both classes are created as
> 'not_a_date_time'. The only problem I have had is compiling my code
> on other peoples machines that do not have my modification to the
> date_time library.
I've given in to user demand -- the default constructor to not_a_date_time
will be in the 1.32 -- gregorian::date same story.
Jeff
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net