Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-20 15:58:45

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:30:04 +0100, Jonathan Oulds wrote
> Could anyone explain to me why there is not a default constructor
> for boost::gregorian::date_time and boost::posix_time::ptime.

Yes, you can see this thread:

> I implemented a simple constructor where both classes are created as
> 'not_a_date_time'. The only problem I have had is compiling my code
> on other peoples machines that do not have my modification to the
> date_time library.

I've given in to user demand -- the default constructor to not_a_date_time
will be in the 1.32 -- gregorian::date same story.


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at