Re: [Boost-users] Re: Re: posix_time::ptime constructor question

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-17 20:49:11

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:30:42 +1100, Stuart Allie wrote
> >> Hi All,
> >> 
> >> I've noticed a problem when trying to use ptime with, for example, 
> >> STL containers and algorithms: the lack of a default constructor for 
> >> ptime means a lot of the STL container methods just dont work.
> [snip]
> >
> >There is a default constructor in the 1.32 release (should be any minute now)
> >that constructs to not_a_date_time.  You should be able to trivially patch
> >your current installation with this change if you don't want to upgrade.
> >
> >Jeff
> 
> Thanks Jeff! I'll patch it myself until I upgrade. Just thought I 
> should check to see if I was missing something obvious :)
> 
> BTW - thanks for boost::date_time - it has become absolutely 
> invaluable to me over recent times. Great work.

You're welcome :-)

Jeff