|
Boost Users : |
From: Pablo Aguilar (pablo.aguilar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-05 14:57:11
Thanks for your reply...
You're right, "reset" would delete the pointer... but when you're getting
rid of a pointer obtained from a factory, like I was in my case, pointers
don't always get disposed of using delete, but rather another function (like
p->release())
And rather than writing special purpose smart pointers for each type of
deleting function (p->dispose(), p->release(), api_function_free(p), etc..)
you can use shared_ptr with a custom deleter (here:
mem_fn(&pointer_type::dispose) or bind(&api_function_free, _1))
"tom gee" <rockonedge_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:507cc4720501042126739a6f6d_at_mail.gmail.com...
> If you intention is to release the pointer, reset(0) can achieve
> this. The document says:
> "void reset(T * p = 0); // never throws
> Deletes the object pointed to by the stored pointer and then stores a
> copy of p ".
>
> With reset, you should be able assign another pointer.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net