|
Boost Users : |
From: aitor (aitors2005_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-18 09:56:58
Hello again,
Fri, Feb 18, 2005 egunean, aitor-k zera esan zuen :
> Hi,
>
>
> Ok. But the problem is that, as that the original graph isn't directed,
> neither are the edges. So, i can't determine wether
> source(mst_edges[i],g) is the "father" or the "son" of the edge in the
> mst tree.
Instead of "father os son of the edge" i wanted to say "father or son
of the vertex", sorry for the typo.
Let me clarify my point. Suppose this graph:
[vertex_number]:[vertex_name] {[adjacent_vertices]+}
0:a {b,c,d}
1:b {a}
2:c {a,d}
3:d {a}
the mst_edges vector gets:
(0,1),(3,2),(0,2)
but if i build the mst the way you indicate, it gives me this graph:
0:a 3:d
/ \ /
1:b 2:c
which is not a tree, instead of:
0:a
/ \
1:b 2:c
|
3:d
that is what i want. Note that the problem is the edge (3,2) in the
mst_vertices vector; it should be (2,3) in the directed graph. Any
ideas ?
regards
aitor
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net