[Boost-users] Re: [optional] comments about none_t

From: Yuval Ronen (ronen_yuval_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-22 01:50:51

> In addition to improving the docs, I'd say that it's even better to 
> include the boost/none.hpp header with optional.hpp so it could be 
> easily found and reached. As I understood, the reason why this is not 
> done now, is because some compilers (such as Borland's) have troubles 
> with initialized data and pre-compiled headers. If this is truely the 
> case, then I think it's easily solved. Include as follows:
> 
> #ifndef BOOST_OPTIONAL_DISCLUDE_NONE
> #include <boost/none.hpp>
> #endif

And I forgot BOOST_OPTIONAL_INCLUDE_NONE to force inclusion for Borland 
users who don't use precompiled headers, or in general users who think 
they know what they're doing.