RE: [Boost-users] [serialization] problem with Borland C++ Builder 6

From: Richard Jennings (Richard.Jennings_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-28 04:19:03

XML serialization is working fine for me with BCB6.

With some of my programs I do get error E2015 reported when I do a make.
If I do a build (i.e. rebuild all modules from scratch) then it compiles
just fine.  I haven't looked in to why this is yet.

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Pablo Aguilar
Sent: 26 February 2005 04:50
To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
Subject: [Boost-users] [serialization] problem with Borland C++ Builder
6

Hi,

I've just started using the serialization library, and am trying to do
so with BC++6.

If I'm right, it should work just as long as I remove support for xml
archives (because Spirit doesn't work on BC++)

I've a class Cliente which has an appropriate serialize member fxn. And
a manager class called Clientes which stores a

std::vector<boost::shared_ptr<Cliente> >

When doing:
void Clientes::serialize(Archive& ar, unsigned const version) {
     ar & m_imp->m_clientes;

     // where m_imp is a pimpl-style struct
     // m_clientes is of the type specified above }

(this is trimmed down code, I can post the original if required)

I get the following error:
   [C++ Error] serialization.hpp(121): E2015 Ambiguity between
     'boost::serialization::void serialize<
           boost::archive::text_iarchive
         , boost::shared_ptr<cc::servidor::Cliente>
     > (
           boost::archive::text_iarchive &
         , _STL::vector<boost::shared_ptr<cc::servidor::Cliente> > &
         , const unsigned int
     )'

     and

     'boost::serialization::void serialize<
           boost::archive::text_iarchive
         , _STL::vector<boost::shared_ptr<cc::servidor::Cliente> >
     >(
           boost::archive::text_iarchive &
         , _STL::vector<boost::shared_ptr<cc::servidor::Cliente> > &
         , const unsigned int
     )'

(I removed the allocator parts to make the message clearer)

So the question is, how do I remove the ambiguity?

Thanks for your help...

Pablo Aguilar

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users_at_[hidden]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users