|
Boost Users : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-02 06:35:31
Philippe Mori writes:
> I'm not sure of the meaning of "twice twice" and "twice on itself"
> respectively.
>
> My guess would be for exercice 3 that I should do something like :
>
> typedef twice<to_be_filled_1>::type T1; // T1 would be T **
>
> // The second time, I replace T (in to_be_fiiled_1) by
> // T1 (in to_be_filled_2) , thus T2 is T1** which is also T****
> typedef twice<to_be_filled_2>::type T2;
>
> while for exercice 4, we want something that would look like :
>
> typdef twice<twice<to_be_filled_3a>to_be_filled_3b>::type T3;
>
> Does I understand the questions correctly?
Yep.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net