|
Boost Users : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-05 12:48:36
Ian McCulloch <ianmcc_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> Ian McCulloch <ianmcc_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>>> * Coupling; you need to include a primary template.
>>>
>>> Ok, but what does that primary template do? Surely nothing, or some very
>>> conservative default.
>>
>> Actually you don't need to include a primary template. All you need
>> is a declaration with no body. You can do that without even pulling
>> in a header.
>>
>
> I think, an empty body is better than a bare declaration. At least, with
>
> template <typename T>
> struct my_algo_impl {};
>
> you can do SFINAE on whether my_algo_impl<T> is actually defined or not, for
> some T (ie. using T::result_type, or probably better
> boost::result_of).
That's a useful technique, but I don't see how it relates to coupling.
In order for a user to provide a specialization of some library
template for her type, she need only provide the bare declaration.
Bare declarations and empty definitions aren't alternatives, they're
apples and oranges.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net