[Boost-users] Re: indirect_iterator of reverse_iterator

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 12:06:00

Thomas Matelich <matelich_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:05:52 -0500, David Abrahams
> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Thomas Matelich <matelich_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 
>> > On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:55:21 -0500, David Abrahams
>> > <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > So, of course, my sample application (attached) compiles just fine.
>> 
>> No it doesn't:
>> 
>> vc-C++ c:\build\bin\tmp\foo.test\vc7.1\debug-python\threading-multi\foo.obj
>> foo.cpp
>> foo.cpp(255) : error C2662: 'TestItem::setItemKey' : cannot convert 'this' pointer from 'const boost::detail::add_pointer_impl<T>::no_ref_type' to 'TestItem &'
>> 
>> But of course, you should have commented out the line that says:
>> 
>> >    c_r_iter->setItemKey(33,33);   //does compile for new
>> 
>> Then it does compile just fine.  Clearly you are doing something
>> significantly different in your sample application.
>> 
>
> May I ask what compile options you used to get this to not compile? 

Standard bjam:

  /Zm800 -nologo /EHsc -c /Z7 /Od /Ob0 /EHsc /GR /MDd /Op
  /Zc:wchar_t,forScope -I"c:\boost"

> Also, if you're using the 1.32.0 release or CVS?  

CVS.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com