[Boost-users] Re: is_integral_c

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-15 20:44:36

Lemings, Eric B. writes:
> MPL currently contains type trait metafunctions for is_sequence
> and is_placeholder. 

FWIW, some argue that 'is_sequence' is ill-conceived because it
promotes interfaces that don't work well in generic contexts -- see,
for instance, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/111645.

> Shouldn't it also contain is_integral_c for checking integral
> constant wrappers?

If you have a valid use case for it, sure ;). Could you provide some
more context?

-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering