|
Boost Users : |
From: Cory Nelson (phrosty_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-17 15:35:35
You might try Google's SparseHash (http://goog-sparsehash.sourceforge.net)
"An extremely memory-efficient hash_map implementation. 2 bits/entry overhead!"
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:33:09 +0100, Toon Knapen <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using a rather big std::map which gives good performance but the
> memory footprint is a bit too big. So I figured to implement an std::map
> as an std::vector<std::pair<T1,T2>> but thus with the interface of an
> std::map on top of it.
>
> I kind of recall a similar discussion and checked in the boost-sandbox
> but did not find anything similar. Anybody knows of implementations like
> these?
>
> Thanks,
>
> toon
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
-- Cory Nelson http://www.int64.org
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net