|
Boost Users : |
From: David McKelvie (david_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-27 05:48:30
Great, thanks. I got your second email, but even the previous buggy patch
was enough to let me make progress. I'll wait with the new patch until
I hear that you're happy with it.
If this is going to be a big job and a problem, it may be worth
considering if what I'm asking for isnt something outside of the concept
of a bidirectional iterator or whether boost::regex isnt asking for more than
that.
I think the original code is relatively fine as long as the
operator++ doesnt have to do a lot of work or dereference the iterators.
The iterator I'm using has the property that I dont know
the distance to the end or how to answer the question
iter == end
without dereferencing(reading) the whole input.
David
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net