|
Boost Users : |
From: Dave Steffen (dgsteffen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-31 10:46:07
Hi folks,
I'm developing a (better) unit test framework for our code; I am very
attracted to the simplicity of the BOOST_AUTO_UNIT_TEST framework, but
would like to use the "expected failures" feature that is, apparently,
only available with the explicit use of the test suite.
That is to say: if I explicitly write the init_unit_test_suite
function, I add unit tests thusly:
test->add( BOOST_TEST_CASE( &mytest), 1 );
with second parameter indicating how many expected
failures. However, there is no way to do so using the AUTO framework:
BOOST_AUTO_UNIT_TEST( testINFO ) // no second parameter!
Is there any way for me to use the AUTO_TEST framework and still
indicate expected failures?
Thanks!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Steffen, Ph.D. "Irrationality is the square root of all evil"
Numerica Corporation -- Douglas Hofstadter
Software Engineer IV
"Oppernockity tunes but once." -- anon.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net