|
Boost Users : |
From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-08 02:11:44
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>
>> Pardon me for being dense, but I don't see what you are referring to
>> on this page. In Table 10.11, the Lock concept doesn't have any model.
>> AFAIK, you can only work with dynamically allocated locks as Dave
>> outlined in another post. But OTOH, perhaps I'm just beeing blind when
>> reading the page.
>
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you are trying to do.. In that table
> (10.11) it is true that Lock doesn't have a model, but it's refinements
> do have models. What prevents you from using say, the
> boost::mutex::scoped_lock model? (Which has the lock/unlock calls.)
Bah, I just realized that I indead was a little slow-witted when reading
that page. Of course scoped_lock has lock() and unlock() calls. I didn't
really realize that refinement implies that the interface of the Lock
concept is also present in the ScopedLock concept.
Sorry for the noise.
Markus
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net