[Boost-users] Re: Boost Logging Library?

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-27 01:10:03

Jwahar Bammi wrote:

> I dont understand the need for the "Proposed Boost logging library". A
> perfectly good and flexible logging library exists in the form of
> log4cxx, which is much more flexible than the proposal, has a ton of
> tools, appenders, is compatible with log4j/log4net etc etc 

Then, why don't you take part in formal review, when it happens, and list
all the inflexibilities and missing tools/appenders in the proposed
library? That's the simplest way to affect things. Or, better yet, you can
give that list right now so that it can be discussed before the review.

- Volodya