Boost Users :
From: Keith MacDonald (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-10 09:25:00
I omitted to state that I linked with Boost.Signals from the current CVS
head. Is that different from 1.33.0?
"Doug Gregor" <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> On May 10, 2005, at 7:11 AM, Keith MacDonald wrote:
>> I have an application that implements the Observer pattern, based on the
>> code and was interested in using Boost.Signals in a new application.
>> committing myself, I decided to check the relative performance when
>> signalling two observers. Both tests were performed on Windows XP, using
>> MSVC 8 beta 2, with the /Ox optimisation. Here are the times for
>> signals, measured with the Win32 GetTickCount() API on a 3GHz P4 with 1GB
>> GOF Observer: 109
>> Boost.Signals: 6203
>> Clearly, you have to trade convenience for performance with this library.
> The performance of Signals has been drastically improved in 1.33.0 thanks
> to a patch from Robert Zeh. It may still not be as quick as a specific
> implementation of the Observer pattern, but it's much more reasonable now.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net