Boost Users :
From: martin f krafft (madduck_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-13 10:48:04
also sprach Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> [2005.05.13.1655 +0200]:
> > Alternatively, or additionally, within the cyclic object
> > themselves, it would be nice if it was possible to serialize the
> > pointer without serializing its contents, i.e. creating only an
> > index in the archive, making it up to the user to make sure that
> > the object is later serialized with that index to adress it.
> That's more or less how the serialization of pointers works now
> - and that's why it DOES work.
If I end up not serialising the pointee object, the framework does
serialise it automatically, right? That is to say:
a.x = 5;
ar << &a;
ar >> b;
assert(b->x == 5)
should work just fine, right?
-- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net_at_madduck invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! spamtraps: madduck.bogus_at_[hidden] "men always want to be a woman's first love. women have a more subtle instinct: what they like is to be a man's last romance." -- oscar wilde
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net