Re: [Boost-users] Re: Boost.mpl metafunction with integral value problem

From: Vyacheslav Kononenko (groups_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-10 13:43:31

--- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> No surprise.  This func doesn't fit the Metafunction
> concept:
>
http://www.boost.org/libs/mpl/doc/refmanual/metafunction.html
> 
>   A metafunction is a class or a class template that
> represents a
>   function invocable at compile-time. An non-nullary
> metafunction is
>   invoked by instantiating the class template with
> particular template
>   parameters (metafunction arguments); the result of
> the metafunction
>   application is accessible through the
> instantiation's nested type
>   typedef. All metafunction's arguments must be
> types (i.e. only type
>           
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   template parameters are allowed). A metafunction
> can have a variable
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   number of parameters. A nullary metafunction is
> represented as a
>   (template) class with a nested type typename
> member.
> 
> HTH,
> -- 
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> www.boost-consulting.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
>
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
> 

Oh my fault, thanks.

Regards,
Vyacheslav

BTW Is this a good place to ask such question or
[boost] is better?