Boost Users :
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-06 11:34:05
Jaakko Järvi wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2005, at 9:06 PM, Vishnevetsky, Eugene ((IT)) wrote:
>>I came across this problem in the real project where I don't control
>>class that corresponds to class Y of the example, so I can't change the
>>signature of the member function. I could write a wrapper function that
>>takes Y*, but after some point the code with a simple 'for' loop
>>cleaner and more readable than the one using lambda.
>>If this problem is not a bug, but an inherent limitation of the lambda
>>library or its current implementation, it would be nice if it is
>>mentioned in the documentation.
> It's a bug, but requires quite a bit of changes to fix. LL/Phx fusion
> will (it will happen
> eventually :) resolve it.
Definitely! Daniel Wallin has done the last remaining part of the
algorithms. Dan Marsden is working on porting LL exceptions. I
think we'll see it happen sooner rather than later.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net