Re: [Boost-users] Lookbehind assertions problem with 1.33

From: Gregory Nisnevich (gregnis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-15 10:30:39

Thanks. It's OK, I can use mutiple dots for now. I just wanted
to make sure that I didn't make a stupid mistake in 

(?<=^.{2}).{4}

-Gregory

--- John Maddock <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> > I'm trying to use lookbehind assertions, and here's a problem: the
> > following syntax
> >
> > (?<=^.{2}).{4}
> >
> > gives me the error:
> >
> > '(?<=^.{2}).{4}' is a bad regular expression: Unmatched [ or [^
> >
> > while the following works:
> >
> > (?<=^..).{4}
> >
> > matching, as I expected, 4 characters after the first 2 characters
> > in a line.
> >
> > Shouldn't the above two regexes work the same way?
> 
> Probably, but the lookbehind assertion code is pretty dumb at present: it 
> needs to be able to figure out exactly how many characters to look behind in 
> advance, and currently bounded repeats aren't supported.  It's probably not 
> too hard to support that case, but it's too late for 1.33 I'm afraid.
> 
> John. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com