Boost Users :
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-18 06:57:09
Georgi Yaralov wrote:
>> Can anybody shed a light on this?
>> // 23 May 01 WEKEMPF Removed "duration" timed_waits, as they are
>> // difficult to use with spurious wakeups?
>> I need relative time waits and this comment made me wary.
Since condition waits should always be done in a while loop, it's too easy
to miss that the relative timeout needs to be recomputed on each iteration.
Absolute timeouts don't have this problem.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net