Re: [Boost-users] [Signals] Proposal effort for TR2

From: Russell Hind (rh_gmane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-27 11:35:51

Doug Gregor wrote:
> 
> We'll naturally be taking the good features from both libraries 
> (tracking, combining, syntax, etc.) and tossing out the bad (*ahem* 
> named slot groups). Interested Boosters are welcome to join us over in 
> that forum.
> 

You probably don't want this question here, but would thread-safety by 
discussed for the proposal?  We couldn't use boost::signals because it 
wasn't thread-safe and ended-up using our own wrapper around 
boost::signals which made them thread-safe.

Cheers

Russell