Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Foster, Gareth (gareth.foster_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-27 12:22:19

> You probably don't want this question here, but would
> thread-safety by
> discussed for the proposal? We couldn't use boost::signals
> because it
> wasn't thread-safe and ended-up using our own wrapper around
> boost::signals which made them thread-safe.

I had wondered about the thread safety of this stuff, is the story the same
for libsigc++?

It ought to be worth thinking about really shouldn't it?


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at