Re: [Boost-users] [Signals] Proposal effort for TR2

From: Foster, Gareth (gareth.foster_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-27 12:22:19

> You probably don't want this question here, but would 
> thread-safety by 
> discussed for the proposal?  We couldn't use boost::signals 
> because it 
> wasn't thread-safe and ended-up using our own wrapper around 
> boost::signals which made them thread-safe.
> 

I had wondered about the thread safety of this stuff, is the story the same
for libsigc++?

It ought to be worth thinking about really shouldn't it?

Gaz