|
Boost Users : |
From: JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-09 12:27:45
----- Mensaje original -----
De: Stuart Dootson <stuart.dootson_at_[hidden]>
Fecha: Martes, Agosto 9, 2005 2:26 pm
Asunto: Re: [Boost-users] [multi_index] - iterator validity?
> On 8/9/05, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[...]
> > So, you can see stability is referred to in the reference
> > section of each type of index. For instance, for ordered indices
> > stability is (succintly) stated in
> >
> >
>
http://boost.org/libs/multi_index/doc/reference/ord_indices.html#ord_in
> dices
> >
> > Does this clear things up for you?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Joaquín M López Muñoz
> > Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
> >
>
> Thanks - that's exactly what I wanted. Just one thing - this
statement
> doesn't appear to be made generally for sequenced indices, just for
> certain methods (that's in the 1.33 RC2 documentation).
>
Umm... yes you're right, I'll fix that bit when I regain access
to the CVS in a couple of weeks or so. Thanks for spotting this.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net