Boost Users :
From: Kim Barrett (kab_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-23 10:44:39
At 1:25 AM -0400 8/23/05, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> The existing unit_test main() function is then changed to call a user
>> substitutable function which is required to call unit_test_main().
>That is a major drawback - we couldn't rely on user concience.
As I described things, the default (i.e. if the user doesn't provide a
substitute) would just call unit_test_main, so that the right thing
happens if the user does nothing in this area. It doesn't seem
unreasonable to me to require that if a user *does* provide a substitute,
that this substitute must call unit_test_main, i.e. make that part of
the substitution contract.
On the other hand, your global fixture approach looks fine too, and is
probably easier to document. So I'd say go with that.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net