Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-27 10:24:01

Next message: Matthias Kaeppler: "[Boost-users] Rationale for explicit ctors in boost smart pointers"
Previous message: Jeff Garland: "Re: [Boost-users] Compilation problem with date_time and iostream gzip (and bzip2) filters"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Thread memory leak reported"
Next in thread: Elisha Berns: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Thread memory leak reported"

I think a comment is fine. Just a question, might be even stupid,
since I don't understand the whole thread lib design rationales. But
how about putting the threadmon_mutex singleton in a scoped_ptr?

Christian

Next message: Matthias Kaeppler: "[Boost-users] Rationale for explicit ctors in boost smart pointers"
Previous message: Jeff Garland: "Re: [Boost-users] Compilation problem with date_time and iostream gzip (and bzip2) filters"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Thread memory leak reported"
Next in thread: Elisha Berns: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Thread memory leak reported"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net