Boost Users :
From: Elisha Berns (e.berns_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-29 18:17:12
Peter Dimov wrote:
> It's not a question of microseconds. The "thread safe singleton"
> solves the initialization order problem. You want a particular object
> available for the lifetime of the program, as if it was initialized
> everything else and destroyed after everything else.
> C++ doesn't guarantee a particular initialization order for file scope
> objects in different translation units, so we have to resort to local
> statics or call_once.
I hear you, I hear the point. I don't have a good solution to this, but
I hope someone does!
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net