Re: [Boost-users] Which boost libraries need libs?

From: Aaron Griffin (aaronmgriffin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-28 10:54:43

On 9/26/05, Richard Kaiser <junk1_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>    g++ -Ic:\boost\boost_1_33_0 unit_test_example1.cpp

That should probably be something like:
g++ -Lc:\boost\boost_1_33_0 -lboost_unit_test_framework unit_test_example1.cpp

> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>
> > On 9/26/05, Richard Kaiser <junk1_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >>Can anybody tell me, which of the Boost libraries need libs (usually
> >>created with bjam)?
> >>
> >>As far as I can see, for most of the Boost libraries source code
> >>#includes are sufficient. For them, installation step 1 from the
> >>"Getting Started"-page is sufficient. Or do I get something wrong?
> >
> >
> > If you build the whole shebang from scratch you can see which
> > libraries need libs and which don't.
> >
> > In addition, you can look at this file list here:
> > http://archlinux.org/packages.php?op=files&id=5997
> >
> > The /usr/lib entries will have all the libs with a standard boost
> > build.... I did the hard work for you... the following libraries
> > require .so/.a libraries:
> > boost_date_time
> > boost_filesystem
> > boost_iostreams
> > boost_prg_exec_monitor
> > boost_program_options
> > boost_python
> > boost_regex
> > boost_serialization
> > boost_signals
> > boost_test_exec_monitor
> > boost_thread
> > boost_unit_test_framework
> > boost_wave
> > boost_wserialization
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>