|
Boost Users : |
From: Aaron Griffin (aaronmgriffin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-13 10:13:06
Hi all,
This is a contrived example, but the solution should be the same.
Assuming I have two rules, like so:
section = identifier >> ch_p('{') >> *setting >> ch_p('}');
setting = identifier >> ch_p('=') >> value;
// identifier and value are simple, but left off for brevity
This should parse something like:
somesettings
{
a = 12
b = "hello whirled"
}
Now, what I am looking to do is, if the parser fails parsing a value
inside a "section", the parsing itself does not fail, but that section
itself does. So if I also had:
moresettings
{
this_is_valid = 12345
bigfaterror = 12"hi there"4.3"fewewfewfw"
}
Then the "somesettings" section would exist in the final AST, but
"moresettings" would not. The error handling docs are a bit unclear
to me, bit if I were to make a generic functor_parser which kept an
error flag, how would I conditionally remove the section based on that
value, seeing as it will already be mid-parse (I don't think something
like if_p will work).
Thanks in advance for any advice.
On a side note, if I have a rule similar to (keyword >> identifier),
the skip_parser will translate "somekeyword a" into "somekeyworda" and
will parse it fine. However, what is to stop someone from removing
the whitespace in the original code. With a quick glance, it appears
the example c grammar from the spirit site will parse "voidfoo()" just
fine due to this. Is there anyway I can tell the skip grammar to
force a seperation?
Thanks again,
Aaron Griffin
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net