Re: [Boost-users] [serialization]

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-13 14:05:46

Daryle Walker wrote:

> 3a. In fact, I made a shocking realization researching for this
> thread.  The standard describes "bool" in section 3.9.1, paragraph 6.
> Unlike "wchar_t" (described in paragraph 5), the "bool" does not have
> to be a rip-off of another built-in integral type!

I would be shocked to discover that wchar_t does have to be a rip-off
of another built in integral type. The only compiler I test on that
doesn't have wchar_t as an intrinsic type is VC 6.0.  Should we
be altering jam toolset to besure tha wchar_t is a synonnym for
something else?

Robert Ramey