Re: [Boost-users] split() differences between 1.32.0 and 1.33.0

From: Dave Dribin (dave-ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-15 14:18:58

On Nov 15, 2005, at 1:11 AM, Pavol Droba wrote:
> The result can be described as follows:
> split() now always returns n+1 segments where n is a number of
> delimiters. Even if the segments are empty.

That makes sense.

> So that new behavious is slightly different, but it should be easy
> to fix your code.

Yeah, it's easy to fix.  I just need to decide if our package should  
require 1_33_0 or greater, or add a workaround to support 1_32_0 and  
1_33_0.  For now, I'm adding a #if that detects BOOST_VERSION and  
uses split() differently, based on that.

Thanks,

-Dave