Re: [Boost-users] Wave: how to recover after errors?

From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-07 20:53:47

Max Motovilov wrote:

> Verified with CVS code, treatment of ignored macro 
> re-definitions is now consistent (ignoring exception results 
> in skipped #define directive, old macro definition stays in 
> place). A complex file that used to be a problem before seems 
> to go through fine. Now the only thing missing is being able 
> to intercept and recover the new definition :)

What exactly do you expect in this context?

Regards Hartmut