Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Regex - problem with non-marking parenthesis

From: Stuart Dootson (stuart.dootson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-13 14:18:04

On 12/13/05, John Maddock <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I have a regular expression that compiles & matches as expected, viz:
> >
> >   boost::regex rxBlah("([a-z](_?[a-z0-9])*)_dvs",
> > boost::regex_constants::icase);
> >
> > I would like to make the inner parentheses non-marking, so I modified
> > the regex as below:
> >
> >   boost::regex rxBlah("([a-z](?:_?[a-z0-9])*)_dvs",
> > boost::regex_constants::icase);
> >
> > However, this throws a bad_expression exception on compilation, with
> > the message "Invalid preceding regular expression". I've tested the
> > second regex in another regex tool (The Regex Coach,
> > http://weitz.de/regex-coach/) and it was accepted, and performed as
> > expected - when presented with the text "a_dvs", it showed one
> > capture, the text "a".
> >
> > So - help, what have I done wrong?
>
> The flags you're passing to the expression are wrong: just passing icase is
> roughly the same as basic|icase and POSIX basic expressions don't support
> Perl style features like non-marking parenthesis, but:
>
> boost::regex rxBlah("([a-z](?:_?[a-z0-9])*)_dvs",
>    boost::regex_constants::perl | boost::regex_constants::icase);
>
> will do what you want.
>
> BTW from 1.33.0 onwards boost::regex_constants::perl now has a value of 0
> precisely to avoid this problem.
>
> John.
>

Thanks, John  - the change in 1.33 looks very sensible.

Stuart Dootson