Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] Transactional persistence ?

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-16 02:40:34

Buster wrote:
> For one, it seems
> to require that you serialize the entire container each
> time you change one element. Perhaps I'm wrong ?

Nope, you're correct.  This is a fundamental feature of the library

> The other problem is that I don't see anything related
> to transactions within the library. This may even
> prevent me from using the library to implement the
> actual serialization of each element, as I wouldn't be
> able to gurantee that the data was NOT written. Unless
> one can hook up transactional archives to boost serialization ?

Nothing is written to an archive until one explictly invokes the appropriate 
operator.

Robert Ramey