|
Boost Users : |
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-10 13:42:44
I've just committed some changes to bcp that give it a shortened list
option:
bcp --list-short
truncates the list so you just see directory names where appropriate, for
example:
bcp --list-short shared_ptr.hpp
Gives the dependency list:
boost/assert.hpp
boost/checked_delete.hpp
boost/config.hpp
boost/config
boost/current_function.hpp
boost/detail
boost/mpl
boost/non_type.hpp
boost/preprocessor
boost/shared_ptr.hpp
boost/static_assert.hpp
boost/throw_exception.hpp
boost/type.hpp
boost/type_traits
boost/version.hpp
which is reasonably nice and compact :-)
Now, here's the question: what did the folks who were asking for this
functionality actually want to use the information for?
I should stress that it's overkill for extracting subsets of Boost, because
many libraries will depend on just one or two files inside boost/mpl or
boost/preprocessor, so using the list for that purpose will result in an
even "thicker" dependency than copying with bcp already produces.
It's possible to contract the above list even further: for example by
contracting to library names where possible, so for example contracting all
of:
boost/regex.hpp boost/regex libs/regex
to just "regex"
However there would still be a lot of Boost headers that can't automatically
be assigned to any library name, so it's not clear to me how much use this
would be?
If folks can give me an idea of what they were looking to use a dependency
list for it'll help me decide whether to stop here or to continue trying to
contract the list further.
John.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net