Re: [Boost-users] [bcp] [shared_ptr] [wave] Extracting subsetofboostforshared_ptr - 3.2MB?

From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-19 09:07:05

Nat Goodspeed wrote:

> > >> Unfortunately bcp isn't smart enough to not look into optional 
> > >> dependencies that are guarded by #ifdef.
> > 
> > we need a better system.  It would be
> > a lot of work, but maybe it would be the first real use of 
> Wave as a 
> > library rather than just as a preprocessor.  We could use the graph 
> > library to do a real search with some knowledge of compiler and 
> > configuration #defines.
> 
> [Nat] That was my reaction as soon as I first saw John's post 
> "bcp isn't smart enough...": wow, he could use Wave!
> 
> But I'm confused as to why you'd need the graph library? 
> Wouldn't it work just to point bcp to the compiler of 
> interest -- by giving it the name of one of a set of small 
> prepackaged files that #defines the vendor-specific 
> compiler-predefined macros that Boost cares about -- and let 
> bcp operate on post-Wave, fully-preprocessed source code? Ah: 
> that would actually discard the identities of all the 
> #included files! Sigh.

Some minor comments:

a) Wave can be used to get all the names of the included files directly.
b) It's probably better to use configuration files containing the defines,
these are treated as command line arguments then.
c) As Dave said, there are macros defined in the Jamfile which are difficult
to extract properly without support for Wave in the build system.

But generally I like the idea of putting Wave into something useful for
Boost itself and will happily help to make that happen.

Regards Hartmut